One In Four Young Adults Is Now Running A Business
US 18 to 24 year olds hit 25% early-stage entrepreneurial activity, tied with 25 to 34 year olds for the first time ever and up 2.5x in a decade. What the data says, what it leaves out, and what parents should do with it.

The number that changed this year
For the first time since the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor began measuring it, US 18 to 24 year olds are tied with 25 to 34 year olds as the most entrepreneurially active age group in America. Both sit at 25% total early-stage entrepreneurial activity, the standard measure of people starting or running a new business.
A decade ago that youth figure was roughly 10%. It has multiplied by two and a half in ten years. The same upward trend shows up in the UK, Canada, Australia, and the Netherlands, and youth rates run higher still across most emerging economies, though for different reasons.
Laurie Stach, who founded the teen entrepreneurship program LaunchX, pulled this together in a report published this spring and updated on September 1. It is the most useful single document a parent can read on this subject, partly because of what it says and partly because it is clear about what the data cannot tell you.
For parents, the practical reading is this. The odds your kid tries to start something before 25 are no longer small. They are close to even.
What young people are actually building
Not what most parents picture. Five categories dominate among founders under 25.
AI tooling and software is the fastest-growing, driven by fluency with language models and the near-zero marginal cost of shipping software.
Creator and content businesses come next: YouTube channels, newsletters, TikTok storefronts, Patreon practices run as actual businesses. For many young founders this is the first formal income they earn.
Services and freelancing run as businesses is the largest category by headcount. Design studios, marketing practices, development shops, consulting, often formalized through Upwork, Fiverr, or Contra.
Direct-to-consumer and e-commerce, meaning Shopify stores, print-on-demand brands, small physical product companies.
And mobile-first services filling institutional gaps, concentrated in India, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
One gap surprises people. Deloitte's 2024 survey found 62% of Gen Z worry about climate, but that concern rarely converts into ventures. Capital intensity, technical complexity, and long payback cycles filter out the youngest founders even on a problem they rank near the top of their list.
Most of them are not raising money, and that is fine
The most persistent misconception parents carry is that starting a business means raising investment.
The report is direct about this. The large majority of under-25 ventures are bootstrapped, revenue-funded, or financed through small personal networks. Raising outside equity remains rare. The largest and fastest-growing capital source for young founders is customer revenue. Second is family and personal networks. Third is non-dilutive money: grants, competitions, university programs, and government-backed youth enterprise schemes.
The venture-funded young founder is newsworthy and statistically unusual. The typical young founder in 2026 is running a small product or a service business, funded by customers, and, in the report's words, under-served by every institution that writes about startups.
There is a counterpoint worth knowing. When young teams do get funded, they perform: First Round Capital's ten-year analysis found investments in under-25 founding teams outperformed older peers by roughly 30%.
Both facts hold. Funding is rare for this group and works well when it happens. The practical parent takeaway is that "how will you get customers" is a far more useful question than "how will you get investors."
The part of the data that should give you pause
Starts have surged. Outcomes have not been measured.
No major dataset tracks survival or revenue outcomes for under-25 founders at scale. We can see how many young people begin. We cannot see, from any reliable source, how many are still running something two years later, or what they earned.
There is a second blind spot that matters more for parents of teenagers. Most sources, including GEM and the OECD, begin measurement at eighteen, so founders aged 15 to 17 are close to invisible in official data. Junior Achievement is the only major organization tracking that band, and finds 4 to 6% of teens have started a business, against survey results showing 60% of teens would prefer starting a business to a traditional job.
That gap between 60% who want to and 4 to 6% who have is the real story for a parent of a 15 year old. Interest is enormous. Conversion is small. The scaffolding that turns a start into something durable was designed for adults with professional track records, and it has not caught up.
Which reframes the parenting job. It is not motivation. Your kid's cohort is plenty motivated. It is helping them get from wanting to starting, and then from starting to sustaining.
Why now, in four forces
The report identifies four drivers, and each one gives a parent something to say.
Cultural. Founding has shifted from an odd career choice to an aspirational default. Social media accelerated it: an 18 year old in 2026 watches peers build companies daily in a way no previous generation did.
Economic. Real wage growth for young workers has been weak while housing and education costs rose. The report calls this the structurally most important driver and the least celebrated. Among US workers, the Harris Poll found 57% of Gen Z report running a side hustle, against 21% of Boomers.
Technological. Each wave, from internet to mobile to social to no-code, lowered the cost and skill required to ship something.
AI, the fourth wave. Language models and coding assistants are compressing the minimum viable team toward one. A 19 year old can now ship a working product, landing page, and billing flow in a weekend, a task that in 2015 took a small team several months. The report predicts solo founding becomes the default for under-25 founders by 2028.
That last one changes what you should encourage. The bottleneck for a young person is no longer finding a technical co-founder. It is picking a problem worth the weekend.
The access question nobody puts on the poster
This deserves saying plainly to older teens, because the celebratory version of this story is incomplete.
Being able to spend two unpaid years on a venture correlates with family wealth, access to a parent's health coverage, student-loan deferral, and elite educational networks. The visibility of spectacular young founders hides how much of the opportunity is gated.
There is also a real distinction between necessity-driven founding, where a young person starts because the job market has no room for them, and opportunity-driven founding. Both appear in the same 25% figure and face entirely different constraints.
And the quiet end of the distribution: young founders report higher rates of anxiety and burnout than older peers. Most youth entrepreneurship happens in a middle, in ventures that neither crash nor break out. That is the outcome to prepare a kid for, because it is the likely one, and it is not a failure.
The report's own advice is to treat sustainability of the founder as seriously as sustainability of the venture. That line belongs on a wall.
What to do with this at home
Six things, in rough order of usefulness.
Lower the cost of the first attempt. The binding constraint in advanced economies is not desire, it is the cost of failure. At home that means a small, bounded budget and an explicit agreement that stopping is allowed.
Push toward customer revenue immediately. The first dollar from a stranger teaches more than three months of planning. Ask "who paid you" rather than "how is it going."
Know the legal edges. In many places, people under eighteen cannot sign contracts, open business bank accounts, or raise capital without a parent. Find out what applies where you live before your teen needs it, not after.
Treat AI tooling as a baseline. Not as cheating and not as a novelty. It is the assumption their peers are already making about what one person can build.
Ask about second attempts, not just this one. Stanford research on serial entrepreneurs found an 82% revenue jump between a founder's first and second venture. The advantage of starting young is not that any single venture succeeds. It is getting more attempts while personal risk is low.
Face the education trade-off early. Leaving school or staying enrolled is a real decision that shapes timing, networks, and risk, and it is unique to this age group. Have the conversation before it becomes urgent.
If you want a structured way to move from an idea to a first customer, Foundra's kids resources are built around exactly that step, which is where most young founders stall.
FAQ
Is 25% really the same as one in four young adults owning a company? Not quite. Total early-stage entrepreneurial activity counts people actively starting or currently running a new business, including very small and informal ones, and side ventures alongside school or a job. It measures activity, not registered companies.
My teen wants to drop out to build something. What does the data say? It cuts both ways and you should tell them so. MIT and NBER research finds the average age of founders behind the fastest-growing startups is 45, and mid-career founders are more likely to build durable businesses on any single attempt. The advantage of starting young is volume of attempts at low personal risk, which is an argument for starting now, not necessarily for leaving school now.
What if my kid has an idea but never ships anything? That is the most common outcome, and the gap between 60% interest and 4 to 6% having started is exactly that. Shrink the first attempt until it fits a weekend. Something sold to one real stranger beats a business plan.
Are creator businesses real businesses? By the report's definition, yes, and they are one of the five categories where under-25 founders are most overrepresented. They are frequently the first formal income a young person earns. They carry the same platform-dependency risk as any single-channel business.
Where can we find programs? Y Combinator's Startup School, BUILD, Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship, and a growing set of high-school accelerators reach tens of thousands of students. The report is candid that this supply is concentrated in well-resourced regions, so check locally before assuming access.
Sources
- The State of Youth Entrepreneurship 2026 (Laurie Stach, founder of LaunchX)
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor USA national reports
- Junior Achievement USA: 60% of teens would prefer to start a business over a traditional job
- CNBC: 60% of teens want to launch their own businesses instead of working regular jobs
- Junior Achievement USA: 58% of teens would start a business to address a societal need
- First Round Capital: 10 Years of Tracking Founder Demographics
Ready to help a young entrepreneur get started?
Foundra Kids gives young founders a simple, fun way to plan their first business.
Try Foundra Kids

